ZKSF logo, a neon quantum brainZKSF

Applications

What quantum computing is worth to your industry, measured

Every page here takes one real problem from an industry, runs it on our quantum engines, runs it again on the best classical solver available, and publishes both results side by side. Including the runs where classical computing wins, which is most of them today.

These are not case studies and they are not projections. They are benchmarks with stated methods, seeded instances anyone can regenerate, and a certified error bound on every approximate result. You can load the same circuit into the console, change the instance to your own numbers, and export a certificate for your own run rather than citing ours.

Why we publish the losses

Quantum computing does not currently beat classical computing on most problems industry actually has. Any vendor telling you otherwise is selling something, and the sophisticated buyer in every one of these sectors already knows it.

So these pages are built to answer a different question: at the size you can test today, how do the two compare, and at what size does the classical method stop being tractable? That second number is the one worth taking to a decision maker, because it tells you when to look again rather than what to buy now.

A benchmark that only ever reports wins tells you nothing, because you cannot know which results were discarded. The rules every page follows are written down.

Read the benchmark methodology

Working in a sector not covered here? Most industrial problems reduce to one of three shapes we already run: combinatorial optimisation, quantum chemistry, or cryptographic resource estimation. Tell us the problem and we will benchmark it.